Posts Tagged ‘free consultation’

Airplane Accident Lawyer

Monday, June 28th, 2010

If you have personally been the victim of a California airplane accident, or have lost a loved one to an airplane accident, then you are probably aware of the need to ascertain the services of a qualified and experienced California airplane accident lawyer. Finding the right lawyer can be a frustrating and time consuming process. While choosing a lawyer can be a highly personal decision and may be based on a number of individual criterion, there are a few things that you may want to consider to help you make the right choice.

1. Decide what type of lawyer you are looking for. This may seem like an obvious point, but lawyers generally specialize in one or two areas of the law. While any lawyer that is licensed to practice is technically allowed to handle an airplane accident case, wouldn’t it make more sense to choose a lawyer that handles nothing but accident cases? Therefore, when you are making your list of possible lawyers, make sure you ask what type of cases they handle and what percentage are injury cases.
2. Ask for referrals. This is frequently the best source for information on a lawyer. Ask friends, relatives or people you work with whether they have ever used the services of an accident lawyer. First hand experience can be an invaluable insight into the service you can expect to receive from a lawyer.
3. Search the Internet. These days, almost everything can be found on the Internet. Most lawyers have websites that can give you an overview of who they are and what type of cases they handle. You may also be able to find information about how long they have been practicing, where their offices are located and get a feel for what their philosophy of practice is just by spending a few minutes perusing their website.
4. Narrow your list. Once you have spoken to friends and relatives and spent some time looking over websites, narrow down your list to three to five potential lawyers in your area. Make calls to them and find out if they offer free consultations and make an appointment to meet with them in person.
5. Prepare for your consultation. Again, this may seem obvious, but many people leave a lawyers office and realize they forgot to ask some of the most important questions. Prepare a list before hand and make sure you get all the answers you seek. Ask the lawyer how long they have been practicing, how many trials they have done and what their success rate has been for starters. Feel free to ask anything else that applies to your specific circumstances. You only get one chance at a first meeting so make it count.

Once you have done all of the above, you should be in a better position to make a decision regarding who you wish to hire to represent you in your California airplane accident case. If you are looking for a lawyer and would like a free detailed evaluation of your case, please make an appointment with the airplane accident law firm of Ledger & Associates. They can be reached by calling 1-800-300-0001 or visit them online at www.ledgerlaw.com

Is A “Free Consultation” Worth Only What You Paid For It?

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

We have all heard the old adage, “You Get What You Pay For.”  So what is the deal with every lawyer under the sun offering “Free Consultations”?  Are they worth what you paid i.e. nothing?  The answer is, maybe.  The starting point is to remember that “all lawyers are not created equal.”

Sorry to use a sports analogy, but if Kobe Bryant offered a FREE basketball lesson…would you thing there was value there?   How about if I offered the same basketball lesson?  Hint; I know nothing about basketball.  Thus, in order to properly value a FREE CONSULTATION look to the person who is offering it.  Likewise, look not only to the person who makes the offer but also make certain the person actually giving the consultation carries the same authority.

Our firm offers a FREE 45minute, if necessary, detailed evaluation of your wrongful death or personal injury claim.  This is not your run of the mill consultation provided by a secretary (prohibited).  This is discussing your personal options and strategy with a licensed attorney.   Accident victims need immediate advice regarding the preservation of evidence and statutes of limitation.

If you have been seriously injured due to someone’s negligence call, 800.300.0001. If requested, you will be paired with Attorney Emery Brett Ledger for your case analysis.  Mr. Ledger is contacted hundreds of times a month by prospective clients trying to make an appointment for a Free Evaluation of their case.   The reasons so many accident victims seek out his advice is because, like Kobe Bryant, he is at the top of his game.

Trucking Accident – Call A Trucking Accident Lawyer

Monday, February 1st, 2010

You hear them on the radio every day—tractor trailer accidents during rush hour. These types of accidents usually have tragic endings. As trucks often tip the scales at over 80,000 pounds and can extend up to 75 feet in length, these truck accidents result in more deadly injuries and more fatalities than other traffic mishaps. Look at the statistics.

The United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), who releases information about truck accidents, reported that the United States experience over 500,000 truck accidents annually. Of this amount, a high percentage is deadly with about 5,000 fatalities reported each year.   Twelve per cent of all traffic fatalities in the U.S. involve truck accidents. Tractor trailer truck accidents are the most hazardous. In fact, 98 per cent of the time, the passengers or motorist in the other car dies as opposed to the passengers in the truck or truck driver.

However, this does not mean that the truck driver is necessarily at fault. Over 75 per cent of truck accidents are caused due to a mistake of the smaller vehicle in the collision. The major element in crashes involving passenger vehicles and large trucks is the car driver’s lack of knowledge of a truck’s performance capabilities, including boundaries connected with acceleration, braking, and visibility.

Drivers in passenger cars often commit unsafe acts in the neighborhood of large trucks. Sometimes, they drive in the “no-zones” meaning the space behind and beside a truck where the truck cannot see. Often, passenger cars switch lanes without warning. They may get into the right lane as a truck is making a right hand turn. Motorists may also underestimate the speed of an oncoming truck and make a left hand turn in front of them. They may merge incorrectly into incoming traffic causing a truck to brake and skid into them. Also, drivers often neglect to slow down or speed up for a truck when it is merging or changing lanes. Drivers in passenger cars also pass trucks unsafely, not allowing enough headway. The car may even pass a truck only to get blown away by winds.

Although these are many reasons why the driver of the passenger car is to blame, sometimes the onus of blame lies with the truck driver. He/she may lack adequate training in such areas as safety and defensive driving. He/she may be forced to work long hours and suffer fatigue. He/she may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol. He/she may be under undue pressure to complete an assignment without regard to safety standards.

According to one study, in 2003 in the United States as a whole, there were 58,212 fatal auto crashes. 4669 of them were truck accidents. 68 per cent of them occurred in rural areas, and 32 per cent occurred in urban areas. 78 per cent of the crashes occurred on weekends.

If you are a truck driver who has been injured in an accident or a passenger car driver who has incurred injury in such a collision, you may have recourse to compensatory damages. We at Ledger and Associates have vast experience handling these types of cases. Call us at 1-800 300 0001 for a free consultation so we can help you through the trauma of your accident.

Contemporary Law Firm Technology

Friday, January 29th, 2010

Justice moves slowly–this is the thesis of the American legal system. Cases wind a long, slow trail up from court to court and circuit to circuit; they are settled, appealed, thrown out, and most of the ends of any individual court session will prolong a case, rather than end it. Further, the laws themselves remain largely the same over time. Subtle alterations appear in policy with raised or lowered fees for bureaucratic machinations, or perhaps something will change locally to re-zone a bit of property, but for the most part, few truly unique laws are ever entered into law or repealed. Criminality does not change, and our felonies remain felonies, and our misdemeanors will almost assuredly always be misdemeanors.

Law practice, on the other hand, is a rapidly evolving entity. It cannot, as a matter of necessity, go unaltered. We tend to think of lawyers as wizened in some capacity with age, or else as young and snappy kids fresh out of their graduate programs, wielding their degrees and trimmed suits like apprentice sorcerers, but in truth neither of these are accurate. They are quite mortal, and their legal practice is subject to the same seismic forces as e-business, medicine, transportation and etc. Attorneys are neither depending upon years of exercise nor new mastery of an unchanging art, even if their catalyst and raison d’etre, law, is slow to change. If they hope to survive, they must keep above the surface tension of the world’s technological progress and stave off obsolescence with all the ferocity of an oncologist searing tumors.

How, though, can one tech-up law? Rhetoric as it doesn’t need any sort of technology behind it in court, and divorce papers will always be divorce papers. At a glance, the digital spreadsheet was the last technological advance to matter to your family lawyer. However, law, while often thought of as a practice in a category of its own, is in truth the classiest of service industries. As such, the name of the game is ease of access.

Proper e-mail communications can connect Los Angeles law firms to Modesto clients. Consultations across hundreds of miles are now possible and feasible. Law specialties can now be shared with infinitely more ease than before–but only by the firms snappy enough to keep up. Your market as a lawyer can expand exponentially, but only if you keep up with the times. A simple e-mail form advertising a free consultation can make your firm accessible and bring in business you would ordinarily miss. Face-to-face encounters are excellent to provide, but not every customer requires them. And for that, they may come to you, but only if distance services are provided.

With the advent of Web 2.0, even live chat is viable. Not every client will be comfortable with a phone call, let alone a formal e-mail–but a chat window is innocuous and non-threatening. People aren’t intimidated, but they are almost assuredly impressed by the availability of instant messaging. Providing it as a gateway can further bolster your clientele in ways you may not have imagined.

While technology is not commonly associated with the practice of law, it is no less important. The devil is in the details, but the details can make all the difference in this digital age. Make every hit online count!

Scooter Accidents

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

With gas prices soaring, and the downturn in the economy not enabling people to afford cars, consumers have turned to scooters as a reliable mode of transportation.Whether it is the street legal Urban Temp 50cc by Roketa for $1,000 dollars or your good old reliable Honda scooter, sales are increasing. According to the Dallas Morning News on July 2, 2008, scooter sales had increased 24 per cent in the first half of 2008. It can be seen that motorscooters have become an extremely fashionable but dangerous means of transportation. Most individuals do not recognize that scooters are categorized as motor vehicles and must conform to highway regulations. State law regulates the operation of scooters, and scooters must conform to state code on motorcycle or moped laws. They are subject to the same laws as cars.

Just like motorcycles, scooters are more susceptible to accidents because they are open air vehicles and difficult to see. The identical safety rules apply. Wear protective clothing, wear a bright helmet, get your helmet fitted correctly, drive defensively, be cautious when lane sharing, and the like. Motor scooters also known as mopeds in the United States should consider themselves invisible in traffic. Bikers should not assume that drivers and motorists can see them. Two-thirds of all scooter-related injuries are to males. In one survey conducted in 2000, scooter injuries surpassed in-line skating injuries. The statistics of this study continue.

In 2000, the most recent study on scooters, there were nearly 40,000 injuries related to scooters that ended up in the emergency room. In one month alone, 8,600 injuries were incurred. And alarming statistics involve children.

Children younger than 15 are the most common scooter riders. You see them on the streets of the suburbs of warmer climates like Southern California. The kids ride on what looks like motorized skateboards on the streets. As soon as they are old enough, the kids graduate from bicycles to scooters. The statistics on these devices are frightening. About 90 percent of the injuries incurred in scooter crashes occur to children under 15. The study goes further. Nearly one third of injuries incurred in 2000 scooter crashes involved children younger than eight. Parents should note that the correct usage of helmets can decrease brain injuries by 85 per cent. It is also important to realize that brain injuries in children can be serious because their heads are larger proportionately than adults’ heads, so the children land head first. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recommends that children not be permitted to ride scooters without adult supervision. They also issued a press release advising scooter drivers to wear a bicycle helmet, knee pads, and elbow pads just as they advise inline skaters.

There have not only been injuries, but there have also been fatalities. Five deaths were reported in 2001. A man on a scooter in Albuquerque was struck down by a pick up truck on a road at night. In addition, a 12 year old boy from Spring Hills, Florida perished in 2001 when both he and his twin brother crashed with a car on their scooters. Finally, that same year, a 10 year old fell off his scooter and died. In 2000, two more deaths were reported. A Richmond, VA man died after hitting his head on a fall. Also, a 6 year boy was hit by a car while on his scooter in Elizabeth, NJ.

If you or a loved one are ever the unfortunate victims of a scooter accident, you should contact a reputable personal injury attorney like Ledger and Associates. We handle cases like this every day. Call us at 1-800-300-0001 for your free consultation.

Rollover Accidents

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

With the prominence of SUVs on the road, there is a growing concern regarding rollover accidents. Rollover accidents occur when a vehicle flips over on its side or roof. Vehicles, such as SUVs, with a high center of gravity and narrow tire track are more prone to this type of accident especially when speeding on icy or slick roads.

Rollover collisions account for 35 per cent of all passenger car deaths, and over 10,000 people a year die in these types of accidents. Rollover accidents came to the forefront awhile ago when the Ford Motor Company recalled Ford Explorers that utilized Bridgestone tires. These tires failed during highway speeds and resulted in accidents.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) prioritized rollover safety as a major problem. Safety experts and engineers have since agreed that the best manner for manufacturers to make SUVs more stable—and less likely to flip over—is to make the center of gravity lower and make the tire track narrower. However, as changes in the manufacturing of cars gets costly, automakers were slow to institute these changes.

Yet, the consumers acted, and their message is being felt in the marketplace. Big, truck-style SUVs are not selling as well as they had been—especially with rising fuels costs. This has resulted in the safer and more fuel-efficient crossover vehicles which are thinner, lower to the ground and combine SUV and car features.

Aware of the possibility of rollover accidents in SUVs, manufacturers have since equipped them with safety features intended to decrease injury and death during a rollover accident. The Electronic Stability Control utilizes automatic computer-generated braking of individual wheels to help the operator control the car in circumstances where a vehicle with no ESC would skid off the street and likely flip over. A 2004 NHTSA study revealed that ESC reduced fatalities in single vehicle crashes by 30 per cent for passenger cars and 63 per cent for SUVs. Since 2004, some manufacturers have of their own accord installed ESC on new car models—only 29 per cent of all 2006 models—57 per cent of SUVs—come installed with ESC. When you are purchasing an SUV, you may want to ask the salesman if it comes with ESC. Its effectiveness has spawned a new federal rule which will require ESC in all cars, SUVs, pickups, and minivans by the year 2012. Under the final ruling issued by NHSTA in April 2007, 75 per cent of 2010 models, 95 per cent of 2011 models and 100 per cent of 2012 models will require ESC.

Obviously, seat belts help in reducing the risk of a fatality due to a rollover accident by 75 per cent. Moreover, some side-impact head air bags or “curtains” can also prevent head injury and ejection during a rollover collision.

No matter how fully your car is equipped with safety devices and electronic features, accidents can occur. We see ugly rollover crashes on the highways and wonder if the persons survived. Some miraculously do while others do not. It may not be your fault. If you or a loved one are involved in a rollover accident or accident of any kind, it is wise to consult a qualified personal injury attorney. And we at Ledger and Associates are just that. With years of experience, we will give you the personal attention you need. Call us at 800 300 0001 for a free consultation.

Cell Phones and Car Accidents

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Have you ever been stuck behind a driver using a cell phone? He or she goes 40 mph in a 55 mph zone or weaves from side to side. We all know how annoying it can be. Driving in one lane and wondering what the individual is doing. Then, we pass them only to learn that he or she is busy talking on a mobile phone. No shock here. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 1 million American drivers are talking on their mobile phones at any specific time. Moreover, a 2007 survey carried out by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. declared that out of 1,200 drivers, 73 percent talk on cell phones when operating their vehicle. It has become the norm rather than the exception.

Despite the fact that there are no statistics of accidents caused by usage of cell phones, its danger has affected dozens of counties and several states so that they have banned in-vehicle handheld usage. California passed such a law and many people still use handheld cell phones. California in addition to Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Utah and Washington, DC have all enacted laws banning the use of these types of mobile phones while driving. This is a cautionary move, and a smart one, because we have all experienced close calls with drivers speaking on cell phones.

However, it is controversial whether DWY—or driving while yacking—is truly dangerous. Wireless cell phone backers assert that speaking on a cell phone is as equal a distraction as speaking to your kids in the back seat via the rear view mirror. Similarly, they declare that eating and driving is just as hazardous. These advocates argue that laws prohibiting cell phones address the technology not the driver.

Studies contradict these people’s premise. A 2005 study of Australian drivers declared that cell phone users were four times as likely to get into a car accident as non-users. Similarly, a 2007 Canadian study also connected cell phone usage with the possibility of a crash.

In view of these dangers, hands-free devices have been used by drivers. Inventions like the Bluetooth, which permits you to have the phone anywhere in the car and plays over your speakers, in-car communications systems, and head sets are now used in compliance with State laws. However, even these devices do not decrease the hazards of cell phone usage. According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, there is plenty of data to infer that even though hands-free phones remove the physical distraction of handling a cell phone, it does not remove the cognitive distraction. This means that you can be so emotionally involved in the conversation on your cell phone that your brain will not be able to react quickly enough to dangerous conditions on the road. Your conversation exacts greater concentration than your driving which shifts your eyes from the street before you.

The issue of employer and manufacturer liability also looms with increased cell phone usage on the job. Even though only a few high-profile cases have been heard, employers are concerned that they may be held liable for collisions caused by their employees who are driving and conducting business on their cell phones. Under what is called the doctrine of vicarious responsibility, employers may be held liable for the negligent acts of employees carried out while working. They also may be held liable if they neglect to establish a safety policy for cell phones.

If you and a loved one get into an accident while driving and using a cell phone or even if you were not using a cell phone, Ledger and Associates can help. We are a blue-chip personal injury law firm specializing in car accidents. We even offer a free consultation. Call us at 800-300-0001 so we can help you in your time of need.