Posts Tagged ‘brain damage’

California Attorney Discusses CT Scan Radiation Overdose News

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

When we are sick and under the care of a physician we take it for granted that we are receiving the best care possible. When our physician advises us that diagnostic procedures are called for to help in our recovery we generally agree under the assumption that the procedure is safe and in our best interest. Unfortunately recent reports may call those assumptions into question.

As early as October of last year the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued an alert regarding CT machines manufactured by General Electric and Toshiba that were used to perform brain perfusion scans in hospitals across the country. A brain perfusion scan is typically done after a patient appears to have suffered from a stroke. A Ct perfusion scan can identify a stroke by viewing the blood flow images and is therefore not the kind of test a patient is likely to refuse. Patients that underwent these scans were already in a vulnerable medical state and the scans were thought to be a valuable diagnostic tool. Reports, however, indicate that the CT machines may have been wrongly calibrated subjecting patients to excessive doses of radiation.

The majority of the patients that appear to have been affected were patients at California hospitals according to reports by the Food and Drug Administration. Almost 300 patients at Cedar-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles and another 37 from Providence Saint Joseph Medical in Burbank were injured by the excessive radiation doses. Another ten incidents are currently being investigated at Glendale Adventist Medical Center in California and cases have been reported at Los Angeles County hospital as well as University of Southern California Medical Center. While California appears to be home to the highest number of incidents, Alabama has also reported another 65 patients that were affected. While Alabama has fewer victims, the Alabama patients appear to have been hit the hardest with as much as 13 times the acceptable levels of radiation. To make matters worse, reports are that technicians may have intentionally used higher levels of radiation in order to make images clearer. Preliminary inquiries also show that the machines may have been set at higher levels for as much as 18 months before detection which leads experts to believe that there may be a significant number of additional victims that have yet to come forward.

Patients that have reported problems after having a CT scan have reported hair loss, skin reddening, headaches, memory loss and confusion. To make matters worse, many of the affected patients are now considered to be at risk for brain damage and cancer.

Officials at Cedars-Sinai theorize that a feature on the machine that can automatically adjust the radiation level according to the patient’s size and body part. Apparently, however, when used with certain machine settings that govern image clarity, the automatic feature did not reduce the dose — it raised it.

If you, or a loved one, are concerned that you may have been affected by excessive radiation from a CT brain perfusion scan, you may have legal options available to you as a result of any damages you have suffered. Please contact California attorney Emery Ledger of Ledger & Associates at 1-800-300-0001 or visit his website at www.ledgerlaw.com for more information.

What a Motorcycle Accident Attorney Law Says About Motorcycle Helmets

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Time and time again, you see articles in the paper and on the news about motorcycle accident deaths. Usually, part of the story revolves around whether or not the biker was wearing a helmet. I don’t know if you recall this or not, but famous Hollywood actor Gary Busey, a motorcycle fanatic, was involved in a very serious accident in December 1988 in which his head hit a concrete curb. He was not wearing a helmet and he fractured his skull. To this day he still talks about the effect of brain damage and the fact that he nearly died.

What does this have to do with you? It has to do with all motorcycle riders and it’s coming from my perspective as a motorcycle accident attorney. I have seen and heard about some incredibly awful accidents. I have handled numerous crash cases in my capacity as a motorcycle accident attorney, and I would like to “not” see you in my office because you were badly injured and debilitated to the point where your quality of life is questionable.

Motorcycles are dangerous and any practicing motorcycle accident attorney will tell you that if you ask about motorcycle accident statistics and the number of cases we handle. My answer to that is frequently a fervent wish that bikers take more care and wear a helmet, because as trite as it may sound, it can and does save lives.

Of interest is the fact that motorcycles make up just 2% of all the registered vehicles in the US. That doesn’t sound like a lot, but, consider this; just about 5% of highway fatalities every year involve bikers and/or their riders. It goes without saying that injuries and death stalk more bikers than other vehicles, just because of their nature. When I prepare for a case, the motorcycle accident attorney in me always prompts me to search for valuable statistics to use in cases.

One statistic I found is an eye-opener for everyone, and that is that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that for every mile ridden, the number of deaths on bikes is about 35 times higher than in cars. Thirty five times higher. All the more reason to make sure the rider uses as many safety precautions as possible to lessen the chance of serious injuries or death, and a helmet is just one other safety feature that makes sense. I can say this with authority given the nature of my job as a motorcycle accident attorney.

I likely don’t need to reinvent the wheel and tell you that bikers have zero for protection but for their safety gear. As an auto accident attorney as well as a motorcycle accident attorney, I have seen many car crashes too, and most of the people were able to get out alive, thanks to that steel cage that provides a layer of protection for them. They also have seatbelts and airbags. A biker has their leathers (if they’re wearing them), a helmet and that’s about it. They don’t even have the same stability as a four-wheeled vehicle does.

Do I believe in helmets? Given the fact that my job is a motorcycle accident attorney, I would say without hesitation that helmets “do” reduce the death toll in these kinds of accidents. They also cut down on the number of traumatic brain injuries, thus reducing the costs of medical care. Just to refer to the NHTSA once again, they reveal that wearing the right kind of helmet (safety rated and properly fitted) reduces the chance of the bikers and the passenger’s death by 37%. That’s a significant number.

Another fact that I ran across the other day while I was talking to another motorcycle accident attorney, is that in every state with universal helmet laws or where they have reinstated a previous law, helmet use has gone up dramatically. The good news is this: motorcycle accident deaths and injuries have decreased as a result. The bad news? The other motorcycle accident attorney told me that states with weakened helmet laws, or that repealed the law, have much higher death and injury tolls.

California has a helmet law. As a motorcycle accident attorney, I strongly urge you to follow it, for safety’s sake.