In an unspeakable tragedy, eight spectators and one pilot were killed Friday afternoon at a national air race held in Reno, Nevada. The race featured various types of aircraft including the 1940′s-era Mustang which was piloted by 74-year old Jimmy Leeward, who was also killed in the crash. As details emerge, witnesses report seeing the plane lurch upwards and take a nosedive directly towards the VIP section of the stands. Dozens of other spectators and attendees were injured- some severely. Investigators are still trying to piece together what actually caused the crash.
Aviation accidents are often particularly gruesome and life-altering events that can take the lives of dozens of people at a moment’s notice. Surviving family members are often left wondering what is next for their families. It is not uncommon for survivors and victims to file wrongful death or personal injury lawsuits against parties believed to be responsible for the accident. In a case like this it is not often clear who is to blame and personal injury lawyers are often compelled to name more than one party in a lawsuit with the intent of ultimately sorting through the facts to determine a clear liable party.
The aircraft involved in this crash was 65 years old and had been heavily restored and refurbished to allow for increased speed and maneuverability. For instance, one overhaul took a total of 10 feet off the plane’s original wingspan distance. The ailerons were cut from 60″ to just 32″ inches and the pilot is quoted as saying “the systems aren’t proven yet. We think they’re going to be OK.” As investigators piece together the remnants of the plane, they have discovered a piece known as the “elevator trim tab” that had broken off prior to the incident and it used to help the aircraft maintain lift during takeoff.
Under the above facts alone, and the difficulty with which it may be to determine a cause of the crash, it is easy to see why personal injury lawyers often name multiple parties in lawsuits stemming from cataclysmic massive accidents like Friday’s Reno air crash. Negligence could be found on the part of the parties choosing to alter and restore the plane if they should have known that reducing the tail and wingspan would result in a strong likelihood of injury. Also, victims and survivors might name the estate of the pilot if it is shown that he was negligent in operating the plane preceding the crash. Only time will tell how this case will unravel and, from a personal injury standpoint, it will be interesting to see exactly who or what caused this antique plane to plummet into the stands.
If you were recently affected by the Reno air crash or were involved in a similar incident, call 800-300-0001 for a case evaluation.
